A Comparison of Young Adults With and Without Cancer in Concurrent Hospice Care: Implications for Transitioning to Adult Health Care

Abstract

Purpose: Concurrent hospice care provides important end-of-life care for youth under 21 years. Those nearing 21 years must decide whether to shift to adult hospice or leave hospice for life-prolonging care. This decision may be challenging for young adults with cancer, given the intensity of oncology care. Yet, little is known about their needs. We compared young adults with and without cancer in concurrent hospice care. Methods: Retrospective comparative design used data from 2011 to 2013 U.S. Medicaid data files. Decedents were included if they were 20 years of age, enrolled in Medicaid hospice care, and used nonhospice medical services on the same day as hospice care based on their Medicaid claims activity dates. Results: Among 226 decedents, 21% had cancer; more than half were female (60.6%), Caucasian (53.5%), non-Hispanic (77.4%), urban dwelling (58%), and had mental/behavioral disorder (53%). Young adults with cancer were more often non-Caucasian (68.7% vs. 40.4%), technology dependent (47.9% vs. 24.2%), had comorbidities (83.3% vs. 30.3%), and lived in rural (58.3% vs. 37.6%), southern (41.7% vs. 20.8%) areas versus peers without cancer. Those with cancer had significantly fewer live discharges from hospice (5.7 vs. 17.3) and sought treatment for symptoms more often from nonhospice providers (35.4% vs. 14.0%). Conclusions: Young adults in concurrent hospice experience medical complexity, even at end-of-life. Understanding care accessed at 20 years helps providers guide young adults and families considering options in adult-focused care. Clinical and demographic differences among those with and without cancer in concurrent care highlight needs for research exploring racial and geographic equity.